WHICH APPROACH IS MORE REASONABLE?

Which View Fits All the Facts?

With regard to the origin of the complex molecules that make up living organisms, some evolutionists believe the following:

1. Key elements somehow combined to form basic molecules.  

2. Those molecules then linked together in the exact sequences required to form DNA, RNA, or protein with the capacity to store the information needed to carry out tasks essential to life. 

3. The molecules somehow formed the specific sequences required to replicate themselves. Without replication, there can be neither evolutionary development nor indeed, life itself.   

How did the molecules of life form and acquire their amazing abilities without an intelligent designer? Evolutionary research fails to provide  adequate explanations or satisfying answers to questions about the origin of life. In effect, those who deny the purposeful interventions of a Creator attribute godlike powers to mindless molecules and natural forces. 

What, though, do the facts indicate? The available evidence shows that instead of molecules developing into complex life-forms, the opposite is true: Physical laws dictate that complex things-machines, houses, and even living cells-in time break down.  Yet, evolutionists say the opposite can happen.  For example, the book Evolution for Dummies says that evolution occurred because the earth "gets loads of energy from the sun, and that energy is what powers the increase in complexity."   

Note: Oh Please give me a break! These scientists think that science answers everything because their minds can think of nothing else. They are in denial and do not believe in God.    Only God is able to come up with  something so complex like humans with personalities, emotions,  brains, looks, etc.  Anything man comes up with as far as humans would fail one way or another.

Next time: Conclusion of Which View Fits All the Facts?

From the AWAKE! magazine, 2011